🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments made by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player in the New York major last eight. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage nationalism. Some letdown would have been appropriate. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all love a narrative, me too. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the chance to beat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. He is more than within his right to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive strength on both forehand and backhand are more than enough to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, though, Fritz is often overmatched. The last several seasons has witnessed the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

The American has made a several dramatic, unexpected advancements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing drought of US male players lifting major titles when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s play in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the very end, when the American had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with the American creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to expend excessive effort to win it. Down match points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and never especially appeared like he believed he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not only express how he feels or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {